of them, BY FAR
ps3 isnt a console in any way other than being sold in a box.
you all are SUPER LOYAL TO KOJIMA AND CRYTEK, but thats typical of this site
- yeah!!!!
good game franchies do not deserve to end,...i just hope mgs5 will be like 50 hours long on a 100gb blue ray disc, ....and with graphics better than KILLZONE 2 LOL..... =D
i have seen now that kojima doesnt have the ability to use the ps3 within anywhere near its ability, come on now, he says he overestimated the machine, yet games like killzone 2 and wardevil exist? and the machine is yet going, we still dont know what ibms project for ps3 looks like, but i can...
to bad no one takes into account that althought the visuals maybe lower than some wouldve liked, there are some things in the visuals that are impressive, and since pc fans hype up crysis for its only true visual feature that impresses which is the size of the game as upposed to graphics, meaning
graphics:size
or
graphics=size
________ ____
graphics=size
thats what makes crysis look good, the graphics are amazin...
when the sequel comes out and blows everything away in visuals, as it so happens this was there first game on the machine.
wii cant dream of doing dx10(maybe) but DX30 is possible on ps3, thats not a dream, catch up pc, play b3yond.
a contrast that tries to make it seem as if that engine really makes a trickle in the killzone 2 engine and RTE, and other ps3 engines, ps3 isnt a console, and ps3 has shown that it can handle much more than DX anything, better come back with a story, "DX20 possible on ps3" cause im not seeing the superiority of DX10 over ps3, and any graphics of pc over ps3, so leave it
well no game on pc looks near this, so you must be talking about gameplay.
yes, thats very typical of a pc-flooded site, of crytek employees, 30,000 of you total that jump around from site to site monitoring not only pc articles and forums, but ps3 articles as well, and any truth of ps3 being told, let alone saying something looks better than crysis, "off with his head" thats the pc contract and moto that you pc fans live off of, God bless you all.
theres proof of the crytek employees(paid) one small comment and he already has an agree and ...
i was just about to say 5, i meant 3, but if this is the best pc can do, then i do want crytek to prove to me that pcs are better than ps3, especially when killzone 2 killed everything pc has on pcs best gpus highest settings possible.
take off the crytek/pc sunglasses you mindless crytek employee, and i have several posts and other articles that everyone else agrees and are saying the same thing, wanna make a bet on who will agree that the game looks better than the old trailer? cause i assure you that more will even say the 2007 trailer won, oh and be happy about your 2 agrees, pc fans are strong on this site.
and theres no such thing as E 305 you reject.
if killzone 2 beats the original cgi trailer? lay off hired crytek employees.
the ps2 will be ps3s shadow
did you just say that the xbox was more powerful than ps3? please clarify this so i can laugh at you, also did you say sony lied about ps3, yet they have surpassed the e3 2005 trailer with new killzone 2 trailers? please get a life, you have no shame, and no sanity, get out.
whatever it looks like, killzone 2 already beats it and crysis 2
as i said, alot of underestimations have been made this gen, and proven wrong, so hold off on the trophy.
barely has better graphics than 180, too bad.